|
|
||
Beyond the Scope of the OrdinaryPosted by MadScientist (Düsseldorf, Germany) on 3 August 2008 in Architecture. A short while ago, the Tour de France had just begun, German writer Thea Dorn demanded to get rid of the the bigoted purity requirement in cycling, because 'sinking into insignificance' would be harmful to society, there would be a need for people who are ready to go beyond the scope of the ordinary. In the public discussion this provocation led to statements that the 'moral outrage' would 'discriminate' German athletes in the international competition. Thus doping and nationalism experienced a strange fusion: the end justifies the means, expecially if it's about national significance. A similar statement came from Martin Walser, another German writer, who also wants to abolish purity requirements. This time it's about the unbelievable Siemens corporate corruption scandal: Walser wants us to accept corruption as a common process that would be just a matter of necessity. Managers were acting for a higher purpose and not for an immoral personal enrichment. Corruption would be just a means for getting orders. The missionary zeal for purity would remind him of the Catholic commandment of having coition just for making children. In this discussion doping and corruption undergo the same reasoning: to prefer the ideal to reality is hypocritical. Everybody does it, everybody knows, it's for a higher purpose. Terms like 'purity' can be found as well as quirky connections to sexuality and religion. And since the end justifies the means, athletes should be allowed to ruin their bodies as managers may have secret accounts. These masterminds of the global capitalistic society (as successor of the democratic civil society) want a society with equal conditions everywhere: everything should be possible and allowed if it is useful for success and higher purposes. The market may judge who or what prevails against the competition, no questions asked, no obsolete ethics. How would such a society look like? If everything's allowed then nothing will give you shelter. Individual freedom is limited to one's financial power and the arbitrariness of one's patron. In the end there would be no freedom at all but only the need for corruption. It's very interesting that right-conservative writers of my country fantasize about this kind of society and use the last vehicle of legitimation: the nation. If corruption becomes a patriotic duty, then there's no individual responsibility left: it's a matter of duty and sacrifice. Would there be less doping and corruption if sport and economy would be democratic? Perhaps. Will corruption and doping support a democratic society? Of course not, even if they would be applied blatantly. Inspired by: Georg Seeßlen, Was ihr wollt, freitag 31 This blog is in holiday mode now. I'm offline for a week and will catch up with you again as soon as possible. In the meantime it's running on autopilot; enjoy! Download my coffee-table book of selected postings here. Enjoy! More MadScientist: eclecticimaging.tumblr.com
Comments (10)
|
Canon EOS 300D |