
Some flowers I've found at this place. Shot on film, developed, and scanned by myself. I like the retro touch of this photo with emphasizes the transitory nature of the subject. And all this without having applied a single filter or major processing (apart from sharpening).
My (old) coffee-table book of selected postings.
More MadScientist: eclecticimaging.tumblr.com, the guy behind this blog
@Ronnie 2¢: I wouldn't consider this a this-or-that-decision: in the end you're getting a picture. Shooting film gives you access to many wonderful cameras with distinctive character - for small money. Being able to control the whole image process makes you learn a lot about various techniques: it doesn't end when you release the shutter. Shooting film uses a different syntax than using a digital camera, but the insights of digital processing are applicable to the old technique (by scanning and post processing the negatives), and being able to control an old camera will make you better understand your new camera. It's a learning process, and in the end it makes you a better photographer, nothing bad about it.
@Magda: Very few processing: I removed the dust and sharpened the image, that's all.
@Steven: Without this tone it would look less antique, I've tested this. :-)
@Lorna: I really want to recommend this!
@Garfield: Thanks so much, Garfield!